UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2218
Claim for extra work due to site conditions different from contract terms (Type 1 differing site condition).
[Name of contractor] claims additional [time/compensation] for extra work caused by actual site conditions different from those described in the contract documents. To succeed on this claim, [name of contractor] must prove that:
(1) the contract documents describe certain site conditions;
(2) [name of contractor] reasonably relied on the description;
(3) [the actual site conditions were different from those described; and
(4) the different site conditions added to [name of contractor]'s [time/costs].
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
8fcef8017efcf6cd97efe3c419d1b928f404d34d6f68390f834b270828528404
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.