Bindinglaw

UT · jury_instructions

MUJI 2d CV2214

Claim for extra work.

activein force · 2026-08-21 – presentas-observed

[Name of contractor] claims additional [time/compensation] for work that [name of owner] required but that was not part of the original contract. To succeed on this claim, [name of contractor] must prove that:

(1) the work was not in the parties' original contract;

(2) [name of owner], by words or conduct, directed [name of contractor] to perform the work;

(3) [name of owner] knew or should have known that the work required additional [time/compensation];

(4) [name of contractor] performed the work; and

(5) the work added to [name of contractor]'s [time/costs].

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-22
Edition
2026-08-21
Content hash
293a2f9d44e665dae53b1f04567965ea19fbdefba017acaa7f9ceb1677294e9b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.