UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2213
Claim for additional costs/time due to denial of access to worksite.
[Name of contractor] claims [he] had additional costs and/or was delayed because [name of owner] failed to provide access to the worksite. To succeed on this claim, [name of contractor] must prove that:
(1) [he] was prepared to work on [dates];
(2) [his] failure to perform the work was exclusively because [name of owner] failed to [describe denial of access]; and
(3) [he] had additional costs and/or was delayed.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
d970b4afc586e181125d64628c9e3839a2a7c551eb92f85c83f40bf250b41e17
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.