UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2208
Promissory estoppel.
[Name of contractor] claims that [name of owner] must perform as promised even though there was no contract between them. To succeed on this claim, [name of contractor] must prove that:
(1) [name of owner] was aware of all the important facts;
(2) [name of owner] promised to [describe promise];
(3) [name of owner] knew or should have expected that this promise would lead [name of contractor] to act or not act;
(4) [name of contractor] reasonably relied on the promise;
(5) [name of contractor]'s action or inaction resulted in damages.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
81bffeb65f5dcab6a146e77e4e7f85222e0e69ca3a399ab893a3d5001fa145d7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.