UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2207
Contractor's right to rely on owner-furnished information.
[Name of contractor] claims that [he] should recover the costs of extra work caused by inaccurate or misleading information provided by [name of owner]: [describe information.] To succeed on this claim, [name of contractor] must prove that:
(1) [name of owner] provided the information to [name of contractor];
(2) the information was inaccurate or misleading;
(3) [name of contractor] reasonably relied on the information; and
(4) the information caused [name of contractor] to perform extra work, which added to [name of contractor]'s [time/costs].
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
3e82cd9df383041cb4d0b935714bc6fe3eaea055ecef8bfbf51b388098ea8800
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.