UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2137
Reliance damages.
Instead of damages based on the benefits [name of plaintiff] expected to receive from the contract, [name of plaintiff] has a right to recover the reasonable expenditures that [name of plaintiff] would have sustained if [name of defendant] had performed the contract as agreed. It is up to [name of defendant] to prove with reasonable certainty the loss [name of plaintiff] would have sustained.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
aaceccd23146aa01134612a3f936ddce4b7a046caf067ac5bc99ecb0214624a3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.