UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2124
Fraudulent inducement.
[Name of defendant] claims that no contract was created because [he] was induced to enter into the contract by fraud. To succeed on this claim, [name of defendant] must prove all of the following by clear and convincing evidence:
(1) [Name of plaintiff] made the following representation: [insert the representation];
(2) The representation was about a presently existing fact that was important;
(3) The representation was false and [Name of plaintiff] either knew that the representation was false or made the representation recklessly without sufficient knowledge upon which to base the representation;
(4) [Name of plaintiff] made the representation to induce [name of defendant] to agree to the contract
(5) [Name of defendant] reasonably relied on this representation without knowledge of its falsity;
(5) [Name of defendant] entered into the contract;
(6) [Name of defendant] would not have entered into the contract if [he] had known that the representation was not true.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
7a8804f95d94f1d385f032bb1c6d4c0afeed049f0cea4f769d1668b85cab376c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.