Bindinglaw

UT · jury_instructions

MUJI 2d CV2114

Promissory estoppel.

activein force · 2026-08-21 – presentas-observed

[Name of party] claims that [name of other party] must perform as promised even though there was no contract between them. To succeed on this claim, [name of party] must prove that:

(1) [name of other party] was aware of all the important facts;

(2) [name of other party] promised to [describe promise];

(3) [name of other party] knew or should have expected that this promise would lead [name of party] to act or not act;

(4) [name of party] reasonably relied on the promise;

(5) [name of party]'s action or inaction resulted in damages.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-22
Edition
2026-08-21
Content hash
ee580712a6f18125874b18b07312931d5c39054b2769b4a469d112cd228d4410
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.