UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2112
Disputed condition precedent.
[Party's name] claims that [he] did not have to [describe the obligation] unless [describe the alleged condition] occurred first. Based on the evidence, you must decide whether the parties intended that this condition was part of the contract. If you decide that this condition was part of the contract, then [party's name] had to [describe the obligation] before [other party's name] was required to perform his contract obligations.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
95cd615559e23bfdd5f509a49bd6b7782e47caa5b9686d6a9980df51b50bfa17
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.