UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2033
Driving under the influence.
In addition to compensatory damages, [name of plaintiff] also seeks to recover punitive damages against [name of defendant]. Punitive damages are not intended to compensate [name of plaintiff] for [his][her][its] loss. Punitive damages can be awarded to punish a wrongdoer for driving [a motor vehicle or motorboat] while voluntarily intoxicated or under the influence of any drug or a combination of alcohol and drugs in violation of the law.
Punitive damages may be awarded if [name of plaintiff] has proven by a preponderance of the evidence that [name of defendant] was operating or in actual physical control of a vehicle within this state and any one of the following:
(1) had sufficient alcohol in [his][her] body that a subsequent chemical test shows that [he][she] had a blood or breath alcohol concentration of .08 grams or greater at the time of the test; or
(2) had a blood or breath alcohol concentration of .08 grams or greater at the time of operation or actual physical control; or
(3) was under the influence of alcohol, any drug, or the combined influence of alcohol and any drug to a degree that rendered the person incapable of safely operating a vehicle.
[There is a question on the Special Verdict form whether [name of plaintiff] has proved by a preponderance of the evidence that [name of defendant] violated the above law. If you answer "yes" to this question, I will then give you further instructions regarding punitive damages.]
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
ac0c229593f0a801f42c0b032619e0d55e056ec65d5ae1ff75e0e74748716beb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.