UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV2030
Reprehensibility.
In determining the amount of punitive damages that should be awarded, you should consider the reprehensibility of [name of defendant]'s conduct. Greater reprehensibility may justify a higher punitive damage award while lesser reprehensibility may justify a lower amount.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
45224b95d0405214c25dc0ab5c8f3218ffb446ce4576b6267db10d04b17b6937
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.