UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV1113A
Burden of proof.
[Name of plaintiff] claims that the risk causing [his] harm was not an inherent risk of skiing. To prove this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove:
(1) that [he] did not want to confront this risk; and
(2) that [name of defendant] could have eliminated the risk by using reasonable care.
If you find that both are true, then the risk is not an inherent risk of skiing.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
85d24a323972ed83cd77a7fedf6094bc8b78d8526d9a90d800d8c4e7441590f6
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.