UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV1105A
Duty to a trespasser for an activity on the property.
... [name of plaintiff] claims that [name of defendant] owes a duty to use reasonable care in [describe activity or force]. To succeed in this claim, [name of plaintiff] must prove that:
(1) [name of defendant] knew or should have known:
[(a) that trespassers constantly intruded upon a limited area of the property in dangerous proximity to [describe activity or force]; or]
[(b) that [name of plaintiff] was on the property in dangerous proximity to [describe activity or force];] and
(2) [name of defendant] was in immediate control of [describe activity or force]; and
(3) [name of plaintiff] did not discover [describe activity or force] or did not realize its danger.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
5ca9551d38af864199ff8c910b152e796e4dc8f0e37b548696acb493c8c5020f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.