UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV1054
Later remedial measures.
Any evidence you have heard about design changes with respect to the [product] made after the [accident] [injury] [product was designed/manufactured] cannot be considered to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in the product, a defect in the [product]'s design, or a need for a warning or instruction. However, you may consider such evidence as proof of [ownership] [control] [the feasibility of precautionary measures] or to impeach a witness's testimony.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
22a724ff7a56e44ee23640e2f633eec50b3b6a28a1083dd7eddeb72b7744cb80
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.