UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV1019
Negligence. Definition of "adequate warning."
A [manufacturer/seller] fails to exercise reasonable care if [he] does not provide a warning or provides an inadequate warning where a warning is required.
A warning is adequate if, in light of the ordinary knowledge common to members of the community who use the product, it:
(1) was designed to reasonably catch the user's attention;
(2) was understandable to foreseeable users;
(3) fairly indicated the danger from the [product]'s foreseeable use; and
(4) was sufficiently conspicuous to match the magnitude of the danger.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
1280cbfcfb313693bd7816168cd88003e8560622c6eeafc12132d4dcba515666
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.