UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV1017
Negligence. Duty to warn.
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he] was injured because [name of defendant] failed to exercise reasonable care in providing an adequate warning.
You must first decide if the defendant was required to provide a warning.
[Name of defendant] was required to warn about a danger from the [product] or from its foreseeable use of which [he] knew or reasonably should have known and that a reasonable user would not expect.
[Name of defendant] was not required to warn about a danger from the [product]'s foreseeable use that is generally known and recognized.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
0e70cc6b98a771df0ba0bd5d6e642da52f21ddb5a3b5662b89212cb6d2dc3899
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.