Bindinglaw

UT · jury_instructions

MUJI 2d CV1011

Strict liability. Failure to warn. Presumption that a warning will be read and followed.

activein force · 2026-08-21 – presentas-observed

If you find that [name of defendant] gave a[n adequate] warning, [he] could reasonably presume that the warning would be read and followed.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-22
Edition
2026-08-21
Content hash
432af8cafe8d365aaadee3215c9ab747000644509b1b1213eb45635732a5e5a8
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.