UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV1010
Strict liability. Failure to warn. Presumption that a warning would have been read and followed.
You can presume that if [name of defendant] had provided an adequate warning, [name of plaintiff] would have read and followed it unless the evidence shows that [name of plaintiff] would not have read or followed such a warning.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
cf5ec6dd95b29c389324503d9cdda1d06aac4cc7a9e480c3226525c751463064
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.