UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CV1002
Strict liability. Elements of claim for a [design] [manufacturing] defect.
[Name of plaintiff] claims that [he] was injured by a [product] that had a [design] [manufacturing] defect that made the [product] unreasonably dangerous. You must decide whether:
(1) there was a [design] [manufacturing] defect in the [product];
(2) the [design] [manufacturing] defect made the [product] unreasonably dangerous;
(3) the [design] [manufacturing] defect was present at the time [name of defendant] [manufactured/distributed/sold] the [product]; and
(4) the [design] [manufacturing] defect was a cause of [name of plaintiff]'s injuries.
I will now explain what the terms ["design] ["manufacturing] defect" and "unreasonably dangerous" mean.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
9c95e96276e82f667c2e208242515c9a5ec2676242cd8ea3305502ba9737f810
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.