UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CR432
Jury Unanimity - Evidence of More Occurrences than Charges.
The prosecution has charged in Count (#) through Count (#) that (DEFENDANT'S NAME) committed (CRIME). The prosecution argues that (DEFENDANT'S NAME) may have committed (CRIME) more times than the number of charged counts. When determining whether (DEFENDANT'S NAME) committed (CRIME), you must be unanimous as to which occasion and which act (DEFENDANT'S NAME) committed for each count, and that the prosecution has proven all the elements for that count. You may find (DEFENDANT'S NAME) guilty of all these counts, none of these counts, or only some of these counts; but for each count your decision must be unanimous.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
2b59625f9a7ac02412039d1c94d722e0004f75458a6ff404922f65fb8ecd4103
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.