Bindinglaw

UT · jury_instructions

MUJI 2d CR1209

Innocent Possession.

activein force · 2026-08-21 – presentas-observed

You must decide whether the State has proven that the defendant did not innocently possess the [controlled][chemical][counterfeit] substance. The defendant is not required to prove [he][she] innocently possessed the substance. Rather, the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant did not innocently possess the substance. The State has the burden of proof at all times. A person innocently possesses a substance if

[he][she] obtained the substance innocently and possessed it with no illegal purpose; and

the defendant took or was taking adequate measures to rid [himself] [herself] of possession of the substance as promptly as reasonably possible.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-22
Edition
2026-08-21
Content hash
e4fda26d017b4c88a05b27f4844fca67c04b4b21f75bb53d9c956605f62f685c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.