Bindinglaw

UT · jury_instructions

MUJI 2d CR1208

Factors Relevant to Identifying Drug Paraphernalia.

activein force · 2026-08-21 – presentas-observed

In determining whether an object is drug paraphernalia, you should consider:

[statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use;]

[prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state or federal law relating to a controlled substance;]

[the proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of this chapter;]

[the proximity of the object to a controlled substance;]

[the existence of any residue of a controlled substance on the object;]

[instructions whether oral or written, provided with the object concerning its use;]

[descriptive materials accompanying the object which explain or depict its use;]

[national and local advertising concerning its use;]

[the manner in which the object is displayed for sale;]

[whether the owner or anyone in control of the object is a legitimate supplier of like or related items to the community, such as a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco products;]

[direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object to the total sales of the business enterprise;]

[the existence and scope of legitimate uses of the object in the community;]

[whether the object is subject to Section 58-37a-5;]

[expert testimony concerning its use; and]

Any other logically relevant factor.

Provenance

Source
legacy.utcourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-08-22
Edition
2026-08-21
Content hash
b33070deffe161b08f3bb73061e066c18971bad36143819897574ca5b47a9d81
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
MUJI 2d CR1208 — Factors Relevant to Identifying Drug… · binding.law