UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CR1205
Possession of an Altered or Forged Prescription or Written Order.
(DEFENDANT'S NAME) is charged [in Count ___] with committing Possession of an Altered or Forged [Prescription] [Written Order [on or about (DATE)]. You cannot convict [him] [her] of this offense unless, based on the evidence, you find beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
(DEFENDANT'S NAME);
Intentionally and knowingly possessed an altered or forged [prescription] [written order];
Knowing the altered or forged [prescription] [written order] is for a controlled substance [; and]
[The defense of ____________ does not apply].
After you carefully consider all the evidence in this case, if you are convinced that each and every element has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant GUILTY. On the other hand, if you are not convinced that each and every element has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant NOT GUILTY.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
a213e5fa79d9125ff02df4ba0fbea906c149005b86edfc15f5b7d067ab965d13
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.