UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CR1101
Failure to Respond to an Officer's Signal to Stop (Class A Misdemeanor)
(DEFENDANT'S NAME) is charged [in Count ____] with committing Failure to Stop at the Command of a Peace Officer [on or about (DATE)]. You cannot convict [him] [her] of this offense unless, based on the evidence, you find beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
1. After a peace officer issued a verbal or visual command to stop;
2. (DEFENDANT'S NAME);
3. [Intentionally] [Intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly] fled from or otherwise attempted to elude a peace officer;
4. For the purpose of avoiding arrest.
After you carefully consider all the evidence in this case, if you are convinced that each and every element has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant GUILTY. On the other hand, if you are not convinced that each and every element has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant NOT GUILTY.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
e748daf2f0520c0b28c4a460ee668fc7d5882d0fb6e41dd030a2d1f40fa4ebc8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.