UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CR1013
Alcohol Restricted Driver
(DEFENDANT'S NAME) is charged [in Count ____] with
committing Alcohol Restricted Driver [on or about (DATE)]. You cannot convict
[him] [her] of this offense unless, based on the evidence, you find beyond a reasonable
doubt each of the following elements:
1.
(DEFENDANT'S NAME)
a.
Operated a vehicle; or
b.
Was in actual physical control of a vehicle; and
2.
(DEFENDANT'S NAME) had any measurable or
detectable amount of alcohol in [his][her] body; and
3.
At the time of the act (DEFENDANT'S NAME) was an
Alcohol Restricted Driver [under one or more of the following circumstances].
a.
[insert all applicable circumstances causing
Alcohol Restricted Driver status]
After you carefully consider all the evidence in this case,
if you are convinced that each and every element has been proven beyond a
reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant GUILTY. On the other hand,
if you are not convinced that each and every element has been proven beyond a
reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant NOT GUILTY.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
2a1477efd199a196995531a51cf12bb18edef6998b6fe224cac558ddfc36aab1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.