UT · jury_instructions
MUJI 2d CR1012
Interlock Restricted Driver Violation
(DEFENDANT'S NAME) is charged [in Count
____] with committing an interlock restricted driver violation [on or about
(DATE)]. You cannot convict [him] [her] of this offense unless, based on the
evidence, you find beyond a reasonable doubt each of the following elements:
1.
(DEFENDANT'S NAME)
Was an interlock restricted driver [under
one or more of the following circumstances:]
[insert all applicable
circumstances supporting Interlock Restricted Driver status]; and
2.
(DEFENDANT'S NAME):
a.
Operated
or was in actual physical control of a vehicle without an ignition interlock
system; [and]
b.
[The
affirmative defense of operating a vehicle in the scope of employment, as
defined in Instruction ____, does not apply.]
After you carefully consider all the
evidence in this case, if you are convinced that each and every element has
been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant GUILTY.
On the other hand, if you are not convinced that each and every element has
been proven beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must find the defendant NOT
GUILTY.
Provenance
- Source
- legacy.utcourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-22
- Edition
- 2026-08-21
- Content hash
1ffac21a3e4a548c765117ec22325e2196d45e8e1924e2b91ce473253f8dd81d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.