US · rules
N.D. W. Va. LR Civ P 26.05
Protective Orders and Sealed Documents
(a) Protective Orders: If a party, or parties jointly, seek entry of a protective order
to shield information from dissemination, the movant or movants must demonstrate with
specificity that (1) the information qualifies for protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c), and
(2) good cause exists for restricting dissemination of the information on the ground that
harm would result from disclosure.
(b) Sealed Documents:
(1) General. The rule requiring public inspection of Court documents is
necessary to allow interested parties to judge the Court’s work product in
the cases assigned to it. The rule may be abrogated only in exceptional
circumstances.
(2) Submission. Unless otherwise authorized by law, a motion to seal
shall be filed electronically pursuant to LR Gen P 6.01 and the Court’s
Administrative Procedures for Electronic Case Filing, shall include the
proposed document to be filed under seal as an attachment to the motion,
and shall be accompanied by a memorandum of law which contains:
(A) the reasons why sealing is necessary, including the reasons why
alternatives to sealing, such as redaction, are inadequate;
(B) the requested duration of the proposed seal; and
(C) a discussion of the propriety of sealing, giving due regard to the
parameters of the common law and First Amendment rights of
access, as interpreted by the Supreme Court and the United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Provenance
- Source
- www.wvnd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
f012637cc89e0ca354fffddad58692c91cc38a35365ec5d35bda9c4244539414
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.