US · rules
N.D. W. Va. LR Civ P 26.01
Control of Discovery
(a) Initial Disclosures Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1): Unless otherwise ordered
or stipulated by the parties, the disclosures required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) shall
be made no later than fourteen (14) days after the meeting required under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 26(f) and LR Civ P 16.01(b). In accordance with LR Civ P 5.01, parties shall file in
CM/ECF only the certificate of service for any such disclosures.
(b) Disclosures Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) Regarding Experts: Unless
otherwise ordered or stipulated by the parties, the making, sequence and timing of
disclosures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) will be as follows:
(1) the disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(A), (B) and (C)
must be made to all other parties or their counsel at least ninety (90) days
before the date set for trial or for the case to be ready for trial and
(2) if the evidence is intended solely to contradict or rebut evidence on
the same issue identified by another party under Fed. R. Civ. P.
26(a)(2)(B) or (C), the disclosures must be made no later than thirty (30)
days after the other party’s disclosure.
The written report described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B) shall not be required of
witnesses who have not been specially retained or employed by a party to give expert
testimony in the case, including physicians and other medical providers who examined
or treated a party or party’s decedent unless the examination was for the sole purpose of
providing expert testimony in the case, or one whose duties as the party’s employee
regularly involve giving expert testimony. In accordance with LR Civ P 5.01, parties
shall file on CM/ECF only the certificate of service for any such disclosures.
In all events, a party seeking to elicit opinion testimony under Federal Rules of
Evidence 702, 703 or 705 from such witnesses shall:
(1) To the extent that such opinions are explicitly stated in records
prepared by such witnesses and have been produced in the course of
discovery, identify each such person as an expert witness who is
anticipated to testify at trial.
(2) To the extent that such opinions are not explicitly stated in records
prepared by such witnesses or have not been produced in the course of
discovery, identify each witness and state the subject matter on which the
expert will testify, the substance of the facts and opinions to which the
expert will testify and a summary of the grounds for each opinion or, in the
alternative, provide a report, prepared by the witness, that comports with
the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
(3) The disclosures discussed in paragraph (2) above must be made within
the timelines detailed in LR Civ P 26.01(b).
(4) In no event may a health care provider or other person relying on
scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge be considered a lay
witness under Fed. R. Evid. 701.
(c) Discovery Event Limitations: Unless otherwise ordered or stipulated, and
except as to complex cases governed by LR Civ P 16.02., discovery under Fed. R. Civ.
P. 26(b)(2)(A) shall be limited as follows:
(1) Ten (10) depositions upon oral examination or written questions by
each plaintiff;
(2) Ten (10) depositions upon oral examination or written questions by
each defendant;
(3) Ten (10) depositions upon oral examination or written questions by
each third-party defendant;
(4) Twenty-five (25) written interrogatories, including all discrete subparts,
per party; and
(5) Forty (40) requests for admission per party.
(d) Further Discovery: After exhausting the opportunities for discovery pursuant
to paragraph (c) of this Rule and any stipulation of the parties or order of the Court, any
requests that the parties may make for additional depositions, interrogatories or requests
for admissions must be made by discovery motion.
The judicial officer shall not consider any discovery motion under this Rule unless
it is accompanied by a certification that the moving party has made a reasonable and
good-faith effort to reach agreement with counsel or any unrepresented parties who
oppose the additional discovery sought by the motion.
Provenance
- Source
- www.wvnd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
f7bfdb7f44df405258e37a33b301450003ffbfc5d13b80e742d104f395cb0c0a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.