US · rules
E.D. Wis. Civil L. R. 56
Summary Judgment
(a) Pro Se Litigation. If a party is proceeding pro se in civil litigation and the
opposing party files a motion for summary judgment, counsel for the movant must
comply with the following procedure:
(1) The motion must include a short and plain statement that any
factual assertion in the movant’s affidavit, declaration, or other admissible
documentary evidence will be accepted by the Court as being true unless the
party unrepresented by counsel submits the party’s own affidavit, declaration,
or other admissible documentary evidence contradicting the factual assertion.
(2) In addition to the statement required by Civil L. R. 56(a)(1), the text
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 (c),(d), and (e), Civil L. R. 56(a), Civil L. R. 56(b), and Civil
L. R. 7 must be part of the motion.
(b) Additional Summary Judgment Procedures. Motions for summary
judgment must comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Civil L. R. 7. In addition, with the
exception of Social Security reviews, other actions for review of administrative agency
decisions, and other actions in which a judge relieves the parties of this Rule’s
requirements, the following must be met:
(1) Moving Party’s Principal Materials in Support of Motion.
With each motion for summary judgment, the moving party must file:
(A) a memorandum of law;
(B) a statement setting forth any material facts to which all
parties have stipulated;
(C) a statement of proposed material facts as to which the moving
party contends there is no genuine issue and that entitle the moving
party to a judgment as a matter of law;
(i) the statement shall consist of short numbered
paragraphs, each containing a single material fact, including
within each paragraph specific references to the affidavits,
declarations, parts of the record, and other supporting materials
relied upon to support the fact described in that paragraph;
(ii) a moving party may not file more than 150 separately
numbered statements of fact;
(iii) failure to submit such a statement constitutes grounds
for denial of the motion; and
(D) any affidavits, declarations, and other materials referred to
in Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).
(2) Opposing Party’s Materials in Opposition. Each party opposing
a motion for summary judgment must file within 30 days of service of the
motion and the materials required by subsection (b)(1), above:
(A) a memorandum of law;
(B) a concise response to the moving party’s statement of facts
that must contain:
(i) a reproduction of each numbered paragraph in the
moving party’s statement of facts followed by a response to each
paragraph, including, in the case of any disagreement, specific
references to the affidavits, declarations, parts of the record, and
other supporting materials relied upon, and
(ii) a statement, consisting of short numbered paragraphs,
of any additional facts that require the denial of summary
judgment, including references to the affidavits, declarations,
parts of the record, and other supporting materials relied upon to
support the facts described in that paragraph. A non-moving
party may not file more than 100 separately-numbered
statements of additional facts. Each separately-numbered
paragraph shall be limited to one material fact; and
(C) any opposing affidavits, declarations, and other materials
referred to in Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).
(3) Moving Party’s Materials in Reply. A moving party may file
within 14 days of the service of the opposing party’s materials under subsection
(b)(2), above:
(A) a reply memorandum;
(B) a reply to any additional facts submitted by the opposing
party pursuant to subsection (b)(2) above, in the form prescribed in
section (b)(2)(B)(i) above; and
(C) any affidavits, declarations, and other materials referred to
in Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c) submitted in reply.
(4) Effect of Uncontroverted Statements of Fact. The Court will
deem uncontroverted statements of material fact admitted solely for the
purpose of deciding summary judgment.
(5) Stipulated Facts. Parties are encouraged to stipulate to facts. Facts
so stipulated will not count against any party’s allotment of proposed facts and
do not require references to evidentiary support.
(6) Citations to Facts in Memoranda. Assertions of fact in the
parties’ supporting memoranda must refer to the corresponding numbered
paragraph of the statement of facts, statement of additional facts, or statement
of stipulated facts.
(7) Prior Leave of Court Required to Increase the Number of
Statements of Fact or Statements of Additional Fact. A party may not
file any proposed statements of material fact or statements of additional fact
in excess of the limit set forth in this rule unless the Court previously has
granted leave upon a showing that an increase is warranted.
(8) Length of Memoranda.
(A) A principal memorandum in support of, or opposition to,
summary judgment must not exceed 30 pages and a reply memorandum
must not exceed 15 pages (excluding any caption, cover page, table of
contents, table of authorities, and signature block).
(B) No memorandum exceeding the page limitations may be filed
unless the Court previously has granted leave to file an oversized
memorandum.
(9) Sanction for Noncompliance. Failure to comply with the
requirements in this rule may result in sanctions up to and including the Court
denying or granting the motion. Sanctions remain available under General L.
R. 83(f).
(10) Collateral Motions. Collateral motions, such as motions to strike,
are disfavored.
History
Committee Comment: New Civil L. R. 56 replaces former Civil L. R. 56.1 and 56.2. The additional summary judgment procedures have been modified to limit the number of proposed statements of material fact. Moving parties are limited to 150 separately numbered proposed statements of material fact, and non-moving parties are limited to 100 separately numbered proposed statements of additional material facts. Stipulated statements of facts are not counted against any party’s allotment and do not require evidentiary support. The rule expressly provides that the Court may increase the allowed number of proposed material facts upon a showing that an increase is warranted. Civil L. R. 56(b)(2)(B) anticipates that the parties will respond to each statement of proposed material fact by either: (i) admitting the fact; (ii) denying the fact; or (iii) stating an objection. The preferred practice is to include arguments in support of objections in the memoranda of law and not in the responses to the proposed statements of material fact. The response should not simply incorporate a response to an earlier numbered paragraph. Civil L. R. 56(b)(10) clarifies that collateral motions in the summary judgment process, including motions to strike, are disfavored. Whenever possible all arguments relating to the other party’s submissions should be contained in memoranda. Civil L. R. 56, like Civil L. R. 7, also makes clear that declarations made in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746 may be used in the summary judgment process to the same effect as affidavits.
Provenance
- Source
- www.wied.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
2fc431824490ae642e8cf108d7c0310f9b6f813a1ee40df21318f2d00b885e87
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.