US · rules
E.D. Wis. Civil L. R. 3
Commencing an Action
(a) Civil Cover Sheet. A Civil Cover Sheet (AO Form JS 44) must accompany
each civil action presented for filing.
(b) Notification of Related Actions.
(1) Definition. An action is related to another when the actions (i) arise
from substantially the same transaction or events; (ii) involve substantially the
same parties or property; (iii) involve the same patent, trademark or copyright;
or (iv) for other reasons would entail substantial duplication of effort or risk
inconsistent or contradictory results if heard by different judges.
(2) Initial Notice of Related Actions. When a civil case is filed or
removed, or a motion to withdraw the reference of an adversary proceeding
from the bankruptcy court is filed, the person filing or removing must list on
the Civil Cover Sheet all related actions that are pending in this District. The
party must also file a Notice of Related Actions. A copy of the Notice of Related
Actions shall be served with the complaint, notice of removal, notice of appeal,
or motion. The Notice of Related Actions must include a brief factual statement
that explains how the cases in question are related under the foregoing factors.
All facts that appear relevant to such a determination must be set forth.
(3) Notice of Prior Related Actions. Whenever an action filed in this
District is dismissed by a party or by the Court without prejudice and
thereafter the same or essentially the same claims, involving the same or
essentially the same parties, are alleged in another action, the filing party in
the later-filed action must list the earlier-filed action as a related case on the
Civil Cover Sheet and file a Notice of Related Actions pursuant to paragraph
(2) of this subsection.
(4) Assigning Related Actions. Where the Civil Cover Sheet discloses
a pending or previously filed related civil action in this District, the new civil
action will be assigned to the same judge.
(5) Continuing Duty. Any party that has appeared in the action must
notify the court, by filing and serving a Notice of Related Actions, as soon as
the party becomes aware of any related action pending or previously filed in
this District that is not listed on the Civil Cover Sheet or any prior Notice of
Related Actions. The Notice must be filed as soon thereafter as it reasonably
should appear that the action relates to another. The Notice must be served on
all parties who have appeared in the case.
(c) Reassignment of Actions.
(1) Conditions for Reassignment. A case may be reassigned to
another judge if it is found to be related to a lower-numbered case assigned to
that judge and each of the following criteria is met:
(A) both cases are pending in this District;
(B) the handling of both cases by the same judge is likely to result
in a substantial saving of judicial resources; and
(C) neither case has progressed to the point where reassigning a
case would be likely to substantially delay the proceedings in either case,
or the Court finds that the assignment of the cases to the same judge
would promote consistency in resolution of the cases or otherwise be in
the interest of justice.
A case may be randomly reassigned to a judge pursuant to General L.R. 3(a) if
it was initially assigned pursuant to Civil L.R. 3(b)(4) and fails to meet each of the
above criteria.
(2) Motion to Reassign.
(A) A motion for reassignment based on relatedness or a lack of
relatedness may be filed by any party to a case. In order that all parties
to a proceeding be permitted to respond on the questions of relatedness
and possible reassignment, such motions should not generally be filed
until after the answer or motions in lieu of answer have been filed in
each of the proceedings involved.
(B) The motion must be filed in each related case and will be
decided by the judge to whom the lowest-numbered case of the claimed
related set is assigned for trial or other final disposition.
(C) The motion must:
(i) set forth the points of commonality of the cases in
sufficient detail to indicate that the cases are or are not related
within the meaning of paragraph (b)(1);
(ii) indicate the extent to which the conditions required by
paragraph (c)(1) will or will not be met if the cases are found to be
related; and
(iii) be accompanied by a copy of the complaint or other
relevant pleading in each of the higher-numbered cases that are
the subject of the motion.
(D) Any objection to the motion must be filed within 7 days of the
filing of the motion, and served on all parties and on the judges for all of
the affected cases.
(3) Order.
(A) The judge to whom the motion is presented may consult with
the judge or judges before whom the other case or cases are pending, if
any. The judge must enter an order finding whether or not the cases are
related, and, if they are, whether the higher numbered case or cases
were properly assigned, or should be reassigned, to that judge.
(B) Where the judge finds that reassignment of a case assigned
to a different judge should occur, the Clerk of Court must reassign the
higher-numbered case or cases to the judge deciding the motion and to
whom the lowest-numbered case is assigned.
(C) Where the judge finds that reassignment of a case that was
initially assigned to that judge should occur, the Clerk of Court must
randomly reassign the case pursuant to Gen. L.R. 3(a).
(4) Sua Sponte Judicial Determination of Relatedness.
(A) Whenever a judge believes that a case pending before that
judge is related to a lower-numbered case pending in this District, the
judge may refer the case to the judge assigned to the lowest-numbered
case with a request that the judge assigned to the lowest-numbered case
consider whether the cases are related. The referring judge must file and
send a copy of the referral to all parties in all affected cases. The parties
may file any opposition to or support for reassigning the cases within 7
days of the filing of the referral, a copy of which must be served on all
parties and on the judges for all of the affected cases. The judge assigned
to the lowest-numbered case must then enter an order finding whether
or not the cases are related, and, if they are, whether the higher
numbered case or cases should be reassigned to that judge.
(B) Whenever a judge concludes that a higher-numbered case has
been assigned to the judge under paragraph (b)(4) based on an incorrect
assertion of relatedness, or fails to meet the criteria of paragraph (c)(1),
the judge must enter an order directing the Clerk of Court to randomly
reassign the case pursuant to Gen. L.R. 3(a).
(d) Bankruptcy Appeals. Appeals to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Wisconsin from the Bankruptcy Court must be commenced and
administered as prescribed in Part VIII of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
8001-8020.
(e) Social Security Disability Appeals. Appeals from a decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security may be administered by special procedures ordered
by the judges of this District. These procedures may be found on the official website
of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
Civil L.R. 3(e) was added to alert all practitioners that, apart from the
procedures set forth in the formal rules as codified here, the judges of the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin have adopted and routinely
follow discrete practices, including requirements about filing deadlines, with respect to
the litigation of the Social Security Disability Appeals docket.
Provenance
- Source
- www.wied.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
239bd622610c22f1836187e6a22eec0ca7305326ea6a00e27e3839ef0cdd94d7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.