US · rules
D. Vt. L.R. 73
Direct Assignment of Civil Cases to the Magistrate Judge; Notification of Assignment; Voluntary Consent; Objections; Magistrate Judge’s Authority; Automatic Referrals to Magistrate Judge
(a) Direct Assignments. The clerk’s office is directed to assign a percentage of civil cases
directly to the magistrate judge, excluding bankruptcy appeals, cases filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§§ 2254 and 2255 or challenging the conditions of confinement of prisoners, and cases seeking an
immediate temporary restraining order. The exact percentage of direct assignments shall be
determined periodically by the judges of the court.
(b) Notification. Notification of direct assignment will be given by service of the “Notice of
Assignment” form. The clerk’s office will return to the plaintiff sufficient copies of the form for
each party, which the plaintiff must then serve with the complaint. Each party must execute the
form, indicating their consent or objection, and return it to the clerk’s office.
(c) Voluntary Consent. Consent to assignment to the magistrate judge is strictly voluntary and
no adverse consequences of any kind will come to any attorney or party who objects to an
assignment. Return of the executed form to the clerk’s office is mandatory, however, whether the
party chooses to consent or object to the assignment.
(d) Objections. If any party objects to the assignment, the case will be reassigned to a district
judge and a new case will be directly assigned to the magistrate judge as a replacement.
(e) Magistrate Judge’s Authority. The magistrate judge will exercise all authority under 28
U.S.C. § 636(b) from the date the case is filed until all executed forms have been returned. Once
it is confirmed that all forms have been returned and there are no objections to the assignment, the
magistrate judge will exercise all authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
(f) Automatic Referrals to Magistrate Judge. Referral of any case or matter to the magistrate
judge is by court order, except actions arising under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2254 and 2255 or challenging
the conditions of confinement of prisoners.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
895ed7a13ccdc7a010a5a531db1cb0af4ae1c5411664c21976e7e982f84c554e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.