US · rules
D. Vt. L.R. 16.1
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
(a) Purpose. ENE is meant to reduce costs and litigation by providing litigants the opportunity:
(1) to articulate respective positions;
(2) to hear, first-hand, opponent’s views on disputed matters;
(3) to hear a neutral assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of each party’s case;
(4) for realistic settlement negotiations; and
(5) in the absence of settlement, to narrow issues and structure discovery and trial
preparation.
(b) Cases Subject to ENE.
(1) District Court Cases. Unless the court exempts them for good cause, civil cases with
the following “nature of suit” statistical code categories, as shown by the JS-44 Civil
Cover Sheet, are subject to the ENE procedures:
(A) Contract Cases. 110 (Insurance), 120 (Marine), 140 (Negotiable Instrument),
150 (Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment), 160 (Stockholders’
Suits), 190 (Other Contract), 195 (Contract Product Liability), and 196 (Franchise);
(B) Real Property Cases. 230 (Rent, Lease, and Ejectment), 240 (Torts to Land),
245 (Tort Product Liability), and 290 (All Other Real Property);
(C) Torts Cases. 310 – 368 (All Personal Injury Cases), 370 (Other Fraud), 371
(Truth in Lending), 380 (Other Personal Property Damage), and 385 (Property
Damage Product Liability);
(D) Civil Rights Cases. 440 (Other Civil Rights), 442 (Employment), 445
(Americans with Disabilities – Employment), 446 (Americans with Disabilities –
Other), and 448 (Education);
(E) Labor Cases. 720 (Labor/Management Relations), 740 (Railway Labor Act),
751 (Family and Medical Leave Act), 790 (Other Labor Litigation), and 791
(Employee Retirement Income Security Act);
(F) Property Rights Cases. 820 (Copyrights), 830 (Patent), and 840
(Trademark); and
(G) Cases Arising Under Other Statutes. 375 (False Claims Act), 410
(Antitrust), 430 (Banks and Banking), 470 (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations), 480 (Consumer Credit), 490 (Cable/Satellite TV), 850
(Securities/Commodities/Exchange), 891 (Agricultural Acts), 893 (Environmental
Matters), 896 (Arbitration), and 899 (Administrative Procedures Act/Review or
Appeal of Agency Decision).
(2) Bankruptcy Court. Bankruptcy cases are eligible for ENE as the bankruptcy judge
designates.
(3) Subject to Change. The court may change the categories of cases subject to this rule
by order.
(c) ENE Administration. A court staff member shall serve as ENE Administrator to oversee the
ENE program and perform the duties specified under this rule.
(d) Neutral Evaluators.
(1) Appointment. The court maintains a roster of neutral evaluators.
(2) Eligibility. To be eligible for the roster, a person must be:
(A) an attorney admitted to practice for at least 5 years, who has significant trial
experience and substantive expertise that serves the ENE program’s objectives; or
(B) a non-attorney, or an attorney admitted to practice for less than 5 years, having
expertise in a substantive or legal area that serves the ENE program’s objectives.
(3) Compensation. Neutral evaluators are paid $500 per case. Parties share the cost
equally. This fee assumes an ENE session of approximately one-half day, related
preparation, and submission of an evaluator’s report. If the ENE session requires
significantly more time, if an additional session is required, or if the parties request a
formal evaluation, the parties and the evaluator must agree on any additional
compensation.
(4) ENE by Stipulation. Parties may stipulate to a neutral evaluator of their choosing for
an agreed-upon fee if:
(A) the parties file a stipulation with the ENE administrator on or before the date
they are required to report their evaluator selection;
(B) all parties and the evaluator sign the stipulation; and
(C) the stipulation contains the following information:
(i) the neutral evaluator’s name and address;
(ii) the fee arrangement, which clearly sets forth each party’s share of the
fees;
(iii) each party’s agreement to participate in the evaluation procedure; and
(iv) the evaluator’s agreement to perform the ENE in accordance with
these rules.
(e) Neutral Evaluator Selection.
(1) Choice and Assignment Process.
(A) The ENE Administrator must send a list of potential evaluators from the
court’s roster to the parties after the last answer is filed. The number of evaluators
on the list must be one more than the number of “sides” in the litigation. For
purposes of this rule, all plaintiffs are one side; all defendants are one side; and all
third-party defendants are one side.
(B) Each party must report its selection to the ENE Administrator, in writing,
within 14 days from when the list is mailed.
(C) If the parties fail to agree, each “side” may strike one potential evaluator’s
name, notifying the ENE Administrator, in writing, of the strike within that same
14 days.
(D) The ENE Administrator must assign the selected evaluator or, in the absence
of agreement, an evaluator whose name was not stricken, and promptly notify the
parties and the evaluator of the designation. The evaluator selection process should
be completed quickly to enable the parties to consult with the evaluator in
scheduling the ENE session for inclusion in the discovery schedule required by
L.R. 26(a)(4)(G).
(2) Conflicts of Interest. Unless all parties waive objection, no person may serve as a
neutral evaluator for a case in which any of the circumstances specified in 28 U.S.C. § 455
exist. An evaluator must promptly disclose disqualifying circumstances to the ENE
administrator. A party who believes that a potential or assigned evaluator has a conflict of
interest must notify the ENE Administrator within 7 days of learning of the possible
conflict; otherwise the party is deemed to have waived objection.
(f) Scheduling and Reporting the Session Date.
(1) Midpoint of Discovery. The ENE session should take place near the midpoint of the
8-month discovery period on a date convenient for the parties and evaluator.
(2) Rescheduling.
(A) No Motion Required. The parties may reschedule the ENE session without
motion if:
(i) the new date is within 60 days of the original date; and
(ii) rescheduling is not anticipated to affect the trial-readiness date; and
(iii) the parties notify the ENE Administrator, in writing, of the new date.
(B) Motion Required. A motion to reschedule the ENE session, for good cause, is
required if:
(i) the request is for indefinite postponement; or
(ii) the new date requires extension of the trial-readiness date.
(C) Other Situations. If (A) or (B) do not apply, parties should contact the ENE
Administrator.
(g) Attendance at ENE Session.
(1) Persons Required to Attend. The following persons must attend the ENE session:
(A) Individuals. The parties, unless excused pursuant to subsection (g)(1)(D) or
(g)(3);
(B) Corporations. When a party is a corporation or not a natural person, a person
other than outside counsel who possesses settlement authority and the authority to
enter into stipulations for the entity;
(C) United States Government. When the United States, or an agency or unit
thereof, is party to a case, counsel from the United States Attorney’s Office who
has settlement authority and the authority to enter into stipulations;
(D) Insurance Companies. In cases involving insurance companies, an insurance
company representative with settlement authority. The insured party need not
attend if the representative has exclusive settlement authority; and
(E) Counsel. The attorney for each party who has primary responsibility for
handling the trial.
(2) Settlement Authority Defined. As used in this rule, “settlement authority” means
control of the full financial settlement resources involved in the case, including insurance
proceeds.
(3) Excusal. The court may excuse an attorney or party’s attendance at the ENE session if:
(A) the person shows undue hardship; and
(B) the person files with the court a written request to be excused at least 21
calendar days before the session date; and
(C) the person is available by telephone during the session; and/or
(D) the person designates, in the written request, a substitute familiar with the case
to attend in his or her place, and describes that substitute’s familiarity with the
case; and
(E) the court grants the request and approves the substitute.
(h) Evaluation Statements.
(1) Requirements. At least 14 days before the ENE session, each party must submit to
the evaluator and serve upon each party, a written evaluation statement. The statement
must:
(A) not exceed 10 pages in length (excluding exhibits and attachments);
(B) provide a brief statement of facts;
(C) identify the legal and factual issues in dispute and the submitting party’s
position relating to those issues;
(D) address whether there are legal or factual issues that, if resolved, would
facilitate early settlement or reduce the scope of dispute;
(E) identify the attorney who will represent the party at the ENE session; and
(F) identify the person(s), in addition to counsel, who will attend the ENE
session as the party’s representative with decision-making authority.
(2) Other Matters. Parties may include other matters in the statement to assist the
evaluator.
(3) Important Documents. Parties must attach to their statements copies of key
documents that gave rise to the action (e.g., contracts) or other materials (e.g., medical
reports, photographs) that will assist the evaluator and advance the ENE session’s
purposes.
(4) Statements Not Filed. Parties must not file evaluation statements with the court or
provide them to the judge.
(i) Process and Procedures at the ENE Session.
(1) Structure. The evaluator has broad discretion in structuring the ENE session. The
session is informal, the rules of evidence do not apply, and there is no formal
examination or cross-examination.
(2) Preparation. Each party must be prepared to fully participate and to discuss realistic
estimates of:
(A) case value;
(B) case costs, including, but not limited to, costs of additional discovery, expert
witnesses, attorney’s fees, other costs associated with trial preparation, and actual
trial if settlement efforts are unsuccessful; and
(C) delay that will result if settlement efforts are not successful.
(3) Conducting the ENE Session. The evaluator must:
(A) permit each party to make an oral presentation of its position;
(B) help the parties to identify areas of agreement and enter a stipulation, where
feasible;
(C) assess the strengths and weaknesses of the parties' contentions and evidence
and explain the reasons for the assessments;
(D) explore the possibility of settlement using private caucusing and mediation
techniques; and
(E) estimate, where feasible, the likelihood of liability and the range of damages.
(4) No Settlement. If the session does not result in settlement, the evaluator must:
(A) discuss with the parties follow-up measures to facilitate case development or
future settlement (e.g. an additional ENE session, formal evaluation, or other ADR
procedures); and
(B) help the parties develop an information-sharing or discovery plan to expedite
settlement discussions or position the case for efficient disposition by other means.
(5) Remedy for Noncompliance. A party who has a substantial belief that another party
has not complied in good faith with this rule may file a motion to that effect with the court.
(j) Evaluator's Report.
(1) Items to Include. Within 21 calendar days after the ENE session, the evaluator must
file with the court and send to the parties a report (fillable form available on the court’s
website) that includes:
(A) the date the session took place, including starting and finishing times;
(B) the names of the persons who attended, noting each person’s role in the
session and identifying each party’s representative with decision-making authority;
(C) a summary of any court-approved substitute arrangement regarding
attendance;
(D) the date the evaluator received each party’s evaluation statement;
(E) notations showing whether each party did or did not make an oral presentation
of its position; and
(F) the results of the session, including:
(i) whether full or partial settlement was reached;
(ii) any stipulation to narrow the scope of the dispute; and
(iii) any agreement to limit discovery, facilitate future settlement, or
otherwise reduce cost and delay related to trial preparation, including
scheduling another ENE session.
(2) Items to Exclude. The report must not disclose:
(A) the evaluator's assessment of any aspect of the case; or
(B) substantive matters discussed during the session, except as required in
(j)(1)(F).
(k) Supplemental Evaluator’s Report.
(1) Requirements. An evaluator may file with the court a Supplemental Evaluator’s
Report if:
(A) an initial evaluator’s report has been filed with the court; and
(B) evaluator diligently continued to work with the parties after the initial session;
and
(C) such efforts resulted in partial or full settlement; and
(D) the supplemental report is filed within 60 days from the date of the session.
(l) Confidentiality.
(1) ENE Process. The ENE process is treated as a settlement negotiation under Fed. R.
Evid. 408. All written and oral communications made in connection with or during the
ENE process are confidential.
(2) Exceptions. This section does not apply to any stipulation or agreement to narrow the
scope of the dispute, facilitate future settlement, or otherwise reduce cost and delay that
was approved by all parties.
(3) Evaluation of ENE Process. Parties, counsel, insurance representatives, and
evaluators may respond to inquiries from persons authorized by the court to monitor or
evaluate the ENE program. The sources of data and opinions collected for this purpose
will be kept confidential.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vtd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
cc40538c5cf87e544f9caa9ad72fd193a7f2931402e61d638d7594030c88cecd
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.