US · rules
D.V.I. LRCr 7.1
Superseding Charging Documents
(a) Upon the filing of a superseding charging document, the United States shall indicate the
changes that have been made in the superseding document in comparison to the preceding charging
document by redline or other comparable method. The United States shall also give written notice
to the Court: (1) stating whether the new charging document commences a new time limit for
commencement of trial; and (2) if so, (i) identifying the reasons the new charging document
commences a new time limit for commencement of trial, and (ii) indicating whether the United
States seeks a new trial date.
(b) By no later than at the arraignment on the new charging document, counsel for the
defendant shall: (1) state whether the defendant agrees or disagrees that the new charging
document commences a new time limit for commencement of trial; (2) identify the defendant's
reasons for agreement or disagreement; and (3) state whether the defendant seeks a new trial date
based on the new charging document.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vid.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
e0c2f11e8f8158979e2b411b1138c55e09a559c5b686d5b28be586002e165b0d
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.