US · rules
E.D. Va. Local Civil Rule 83.6
Settlement and Alternative Dispute Resolution
(A) The Court encourages the parties to meet and consult with each other to achieve settlement. Pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. §§§ 651, 652, and 653, as amended by the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act of 1998, the
use of mediation as an alternative dispute resolution process in all civil actions, including adversary
proceedings in bankruptcy, is authorized. Litigants in all civil cases shall be advised of the availability of
mediation and may request it. The continued utilization of settlement conferences as a form of mediation
is also authorized.
(B) The parties by consent may select and compensate any mutually acceptable non-judicial mediator or
neutral. No mediator or neutral may be compensated by contingent fee.
(C) All district judges, magistrate judges, and bankruptcy judges are authorized to act as mediators or
neutrals.
(D) The appointment of a mediator or neutral shall not operate to postpone or stay the scheduling of any
case or controversy nor shall such appointment be grounds for the continuance of a previously scheduled
trial date or the extension of any deadlines previously scheduled by the Court.
(E) The substance of communication in the mediation process shall not be disclosed to any person other
than participants in the mediation process; provided, however, that nothing herein shall modify the
application of Federal Rule of Evidence 408 nor shall use in the mediation process of an otherwise
admissible document, object, or statement preclude its use at trial.
(F) The chief judge of the district court shall appoint an ADR Administrator for the district. Duties of the
Administrator shall include the following: implementing, administering, overseeing and evaluating the
Court's ADR program.
(G) By order, a district judge, or a magistrate judge to whom a case has been referred on consent or for
settlement conference, may provide that counsel and/or a party representative with full settlement
authority shall attend a settlement conference at any time the judge considers appropriate.
Provenance
- Source
- www.vaed.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-18
- Content hash
10427d8807b8fe19d5df66481f33e49b05564bffbd4742b1747a4cfaea1510c4
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.