US · rules
D. Utah DUCivR 37-1
Discovery Disputes
Resolution Without Court Assistance.
(1) The parties must make reasonable efforts to resolve a discovery dispute
arising under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 through 37 before seeking court assistance.
(2) At a minimum, those efforts must include a prompt written
communication sent to the opposing party:
(A) identifying the discovery disclosure or request at issue, the
response, and specifying why the response or objection is
inadequate; and
(B) requesting to meet and confer, either in person or by telephone,
and include suggested dates and times.
(b) Short Form Discovery Motion.
(1) If the discovery dispute remains after reasonable efforts, and the parties
need a court order to resolve the dispute, the parties (either individually
or jointly) must file a Short Form Discovery Motion, which should not
exceed 500 words exclusive of caption and signature block.
(2) The motion must:
(A) include a certification that states—
(i) the parties made reasonable efforts to reach agreement on
the disputed matters;
(ii) the date, time, and method of the reasonable efforts; and
(iii) the names of all participating parties or attorneys;
(B) include as the only exhibits to the motion a copy of the disputed
discovery request and any response; and
(C) be filed no later than 45 days after the prompt written
communication in section 37-1(a)(2) was sent to opposing counsel,
unless the court grants an extension of time for good cause. Failure
to meet the deadline may result in automatic denial of the motion.
(3) The opposing party must file its response 5 business days4 after the filing
of the motion, unless the court orders otherwise. The response must not
exceed 500 words, exclusive of caption and signature block and must not
include any additional exhibits.
(4) At the time of filing a motion or response, each party must email to
chambers and the opposing party a proposed order in a word processing
format.
(5) To resolve the dispute, the court may:
(A) set a hearing without waiting for a response to the motion;
(B) decide the motion after the opposing party has had an opportunity
to respond, either at a hearing or in writing; or
(C) request additional briefing and set a briefing schedule.
(6) A party may request leave to file an overlength short form discovery
motion or response consistent with DUCivR 7-1.
(7) A motion to quash a subpoena or a motion related to the standard
protective order is exempt from the Short Form Discovery Motion
requirements above and must follow DUCivR 7-1(a)(4)(D).
(c) Expedited Consideration.
When filing its motion in CM/ECF, the moving party must first select the “Short
Form Discovery” event and then select “Expedite.”
4 This provision is not subject to the addition of 3 days provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d).
(d) Discovery Dispute Conference.
The parties may request that the court conduct a discovery dispute conference
by contacting chambers or filing a stipulated one-page motion requesting a
discovery dispute conference, which includes suggested dates and times the
parties are available.
Deposition Dispute.
This rule does not apply to disputes arising during a deposition. Those disputes,
including those that arise under Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(d)(3), may be resolved by
contacting the assigned judge by phone.
Objection to Magistrate Judge’s Discovery Ruling.
(1) Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and DUCivR 72-2 govern objections to the magistrate
judge’s oral or written discovery ruling.
(2) When filing an objection, the party must seek expedited treatment.
Provenance
- Source
- www.utd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
568515f8533816fa60f66d629d79e2f81eda779e9b97883056a85fea1decf144
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.