US · rules
D. Utah DUCivR 29-1
Extending Discovery Response Deadlines
(a) Agreement Without Court Order.
Parties may agree to extend the time to respond to a discovery request without
court approval, unless:
(1) the time originally prescribed to respond has expired; or
(2) the extension modifies or interferes with:
(A) a deadline established by the case scheduling order;
(B) a filing deadline established by the court, the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, or these Local Rules;
(C) a court-scheduled conference;
(D) a deadline for filing a proposed pretrial order;
(E) a trial date; or
(F) any other deadline referenced in Fed. R. Civ. P. 29(b).
(b) Court Order Required.
If the circumstances in section 29-1(a)(1) or (2) are present, the parties must
obtain court approval to extend the discovery response deadline by filing a
stipulated motion and proposed order.
Provenance
- Source
- www.utd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
ab88a0f68d4b48a1893b1af142576745817f46647c2d5eeb4a9765c1b8249586
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.