Bindinglaw

US · rules

N.D. Tex. LCrR 59.2

Briefing Practice Concerning Objections to Magistrate Judge

activein force · 2026-09-01 – presentact-effective-date

Recommendations on Dispositive Motions.

(a) Brief. Objections filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2) must be accompanied by a

brief that sets forth the party’s contentions of fact and/or law, and argument and

authorities, and complies with LCrR 47.2.

(b) Response Brief. A response brief to objections filed under Fed. R. Crim. P.

59(b)(2) must comply with LCrR 47.2 and be filed within 14 days from the date the

objections are filed.

(c) Reply Brief. Reply briefs may not be filed unless the moving party requests, and

the presiding judge grants, leave to do so. If leave is granted, the reply brief shall

be filed no later than the deadline set by the presiding judge and comply with LCrR

47.2.

Page 17

Provenance

Source
www.txnd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
e6352c93f2a5ac256da3d19f0c307bd1aafcde327273a7c199dfc557060454aa
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
N.D. Tex. LCrR 59.2 — Briefing Practice Concerning Ob… · binding.law