US · rules
M.D. Tenn. LCrR 2.01
Release of Information Concerning Criminal Proceedings
(a) By Attorneys
(1) Limitation of Extrajudicial Statements. A lawyer who is participating or has
participated in the investigation or litigation of a matter either directly or indirectly
must not make an extrajudicial statement (other than a quotation from or reference to
public records) that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know will be disseminated
by public communication, and will have a substantial likelihood of materially
prejudicing an adjudicative proceeding in the matter, including especially that will
interfere with a fair trial.
(2) Comments More Likely Than Not to Have a Material Prejudicial Effect Even if
Included in the Public Record. A comment relating to the following matters is more
likely than not to have a material prejudicial effect on a proceeding, even if included in
the public record, and the burden is upon the person commenting upon such matters to
show that the comment did not pose such a threat:
(A) Grand Jury and Pending Investigations. Any extrajudicial statement outside
the limitations under (a)(1), including the character, credibility, reputation, or
criminal record of a suspect in a criminal investigation except such statement
as is necessary to inform the public that the investigation is underway, to
describe the general scope of the investigation, to obtain assistance in the
apprehension of a suspect, to warn the public of any dangers, or otherwise seek
the public’s aid in the investigation;
(B) Following Formal Charges Through Adjudication. After formal charges
have been initiated (meaning an arrest, issuance of an arrest warrant, or the
filing of a complaint, information or indictment in any criminal matter), until
the conclusion of trial or the disposition without trial, any extrajudicial
statement outside the limitations under (a)(1) relating to the matter and
concerning:
(i) The prior criminal record (including arrests, indictments, or other
charges of crime), or the character or reputation of the accused, except
that the attorney or law firm may make a factual statement of the
accused’s name, age, residence, occupation, and family status, and if the
accused has not been apprehended, an attorney associated with the
prosecution may release any information necessary to aid in
apprehension or to warn the public of any dangers presented;
(ii) The possibility of a plea of guilty to the offenses charged or to a lesser
offense, the existence or contents of any confession, admission, or
statement given by the accused, or the refusal or failure of the accused
to make any statement;
(iii) The performance of any examination or tests or the accused’s refusal or
failure to submit to an examination or test;
(iv) The character, credibility, reputation, or criminal record of a party or the
identity, testimony, or credibility of prospective witnesses, except that
the attorney may announce the identity of the victim if the
announcement is not otherwise prohibited by law;
(v) The identity or nature of physical evidence expected to be presented;
(vi) The fact that an accused has been charged with a crime, unless there is
included therein a statement that the charge is merely an accusation and
that the accused is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty;
(vii) Any opinion as to the accused’s guilt or innocence, or as to the evidence
in the case; or
(viii) Information that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is likely
to be inadmissible as evidence in a trial or that would, if disclosed, create
a substantial risk of prejudicing an impartial trial.
The foregoing shall not be construed to preclude the prosecution or defense
attorney during this period, in the proper discharge of their official or
professional obligations, from announcing the fact and circumstances of arrest
(including time and place of arrest, resistance, pursuit, and use of weapons), the
identity of the investigating and arresting officer or agency, and the length of
the investigation; from making an announcement, at the time of seizure of
physical evidence other than a confession, admission, or statement, that is
limited to a description of the evidence seized; from disclosing the nature,
substance, or text of the charge including a brief description of the offense
charged; from quoting or referring without comment to public records of the
Court in the case; from requesting assistance in obtaining evidence; or from
announcing (without further comment) that the accused denies the charges,
maintains their innocence and looks forward to their day in court.
(3) Statements Necessary to Protect a Client from Substantial Undue Prejudice.
Notwithstanding paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2), a lawyer may make a statement that a
reasonable lawyer would believe is required to protect a client from the substantial
undue prejudicial effect of recent publicity not initiated by the lawyer or the lawyer’s
client. A statement made pursuant to this paragraph must be limited to such information
as is necessary to mitigate the recent adverse publicity.
(4) Applications to Law Firms and Agencies. The provisions of this rule concerning
lawyers apply to the law firm and government agencies or offices, and the partners and
employees of such firms, government agencies or offices, with which the lawyer is
associated.
(b) Additional Restrictions by the Court. Nothing in this rule is intended to preclude the
formation or application of more restrictive rules, upon motion of any party or by the Court
on its own, related to the release of information about juvenile or other offenders, to
preclude the holding of hearings or the lawful issuance of reports by legislative,
administrative or investigative bodies, to address the seating and conduct of spectators and
media representatives, to preclude any attorney from replying to charges of misconduct
that are publicly made against that attorney, or to address any other matters that the Court
may deem appropriate for inclusion.
(c) By Courthouse Personnel. All courthouse personnel, including but not limited to,
employees of the Clerk’s office, employees of the Court (including judicial chambers
staff), employees of the Probation and Pretrial Services office, and the United States
Marshals Service employees including Court Security Officer(s), are prohibited from
disclosing to any person, without authorization by the Court, information relating to a
pending criminal proceeding that is not part of the public record of the Court. This Rule
specifically forbids the divulging of information concerning arguments and hearings held
in chambers or otherwise outside the presence of the public.
Provenance
- Source
- www.tnmd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
f7aa700b829844aa8ad2730cf7fb12988fe3e256cbc5da0d5d87b49b8e2737e1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.