Bindinglaw

US · rules

E.D. Tenn. L.R. 16.3

Alternative Dispute Resolution

activein force · 2026-04-08 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Reference by Court. The Court may, in the judge's discretion and with the consent of the

parties, refer any civil case, including adversary proceedings removed from bankruptcy court, for

a settlement conference or any other method of alternative dispute resolution deemed appropriate

to the needs of the case except that arbitration can only be authorized as provided in 28 U.S.C. §

654. Additionally, mediation can be ordered by the Court without consent of the parties as set

forth in Local Rule 16.4.

(b) Consideration of ADR by Litigants. Pursuant to the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act

of 1998, 28 U.S.C. §§ 651 et seq., litigants in all civil cases, except those exempted as indicated

below, shall consider the use of an alternative dispute resolution process at an appropriate stage in

the litigation.

Civil cases which are exempted from this requirement are:

• Deportation Actions

• Forfeiture and statutory penalty actions

• Freedom of Information actions

• Government collection actions

• Judgments - actions to enforce or register

• Prisoner actions to vacate sentence, for habeas corpus, or for mandamus

• Pro Se Prisoner Cases

• Social Security reviews

• Summons/subpoenas - proceedings to enforce/contest government summons and

private party depositions

• Third-party IRS tax actions

• Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 Proceedings

• Student loan cases

Provenance

Source
www.tned.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
24b274ae3e1774fa84ec6b7fe2a197705b0e424cd34692288bc9229f894d3ec5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.