US · rules
E.D. Tenn. L.R. 16.3
Alternative Dispute Resolution
(a) Reference by Court. The Court may, in the judge's discretion and with the consent of the
parties, refer any civil case, including adversary proceedings removed from bankruptcy court, for
a settlement conference or any other method of alternative dispute resolution deemed appropriate
to the needs of the case except that arbitration can only be authorized as provided in 28 U.S.C. §
654. Additionally, mediation can be ordered by the Court without consent of the parties as set
forth in Local Rule 16.4.
(b) Consideration of ADR by Litigants. Pursuant to the Alternative Dispute Resolution Act
of 1998, 28 U.S.C. §§ 651 et seq., litigants in all civil cases, except those exempted as indicated
below, shall consider the use of an alternative dispute resolution process at an appropriate stage in
the litigation.
Civil cases which are exempted from this requirement are:
• Deportation Actions
• Forfeiture and statutory penalty actions
• Freedom of Information actions
• Government collection actions
• Judgments - actions to enforce or register
• Prisoner actions to vacate sentence, for habeas corpus, or for mandamus
• Pro Se Prisoner Cases
• Social Security reviews
• Summons/subpoenas - proceedings to enforce/contest government summons and
private party depositions
• Third-party IRS tax actions
• Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 Proceedings
• Student loan cases
Provenance
- Source
- www.tned.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
24b274ae3e1774fa84ec6b7fe2a197705b0e424cd34692288bc9229f894d3ec5
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.