Bindinglaw

US · rules

D.S.D. Crim. LR 28.1

Interpreters

activein force · 2025-02-28 – presentact-effective-date

A. Responsibility for Obtaining. When interpreters are required for proceedings instituted by the United States, the clerk of court will locate certified or

otherwise qualified interpreters for court proceedings. However, the U.S.

attorney=s office is responsible for locating, contracting, and paying

interpreters for government witnesses. For most other purposes, a party

requiring the services of an interpreter must obtain his or her own

interpreting services. If the defendant is indigent, prior court approval to hire

an interpreter is required as specified in the Guide to Judiciary Policy and 18

U.S.C. ' 3006A(e). If counsel for either party believes that interpreter services

for court proceedings are needed for more than an hour, counsel must notify

the clerk of court as soon as possible.

If participants in federal court proceedings are deaf, hearing impaired or have

communication disabilities, the court will provide sign language interpreters.

B. Certified Telephone Interpreters. In criminal cases, the court may use certified interpreters supplied by the Telephone Interpreting Program sponsored

by the Administrative Office of the United States Courts for hearings that do

not exceed an hour. Any objection to the use of such an interpreter must be

made before the commencement of the proceeding being interpreted.

Provenance

Source
www.sdd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
c2a68239bd392cb35b9a43204fb5424b58855eb17a3eca3c8b8934f844934ff4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.S.D. Crim. LR 28.1 — Interpreters · binding.law