US · rules
D.S.C. Local Civ. Rule 5.06
Substitution, Correction, and Removal of Electronically Filed Documents
Nothing in this rule precludes the clerk of court (1) on request of the filing party, from accepting
and substituting a corrected document that properly redacts or removes any personal identifiers
or other information protected from disclosure by statute, rule, regulation, or policy and
procedures officially adopted by this district or (2) on request of a party with the consent of all
other parties, from accepting and substituting a redacted document for a previously filed
document for any other reason. All other requests to redact the content of a previously filed
document, or to remove it from the docket, shall be granted only upon motion and order.4
4 Nothing in this rule limits the authority of the clerk of court to correct filing entries or require
parties to file or submit corrected documents to conform to the formatting, technical, or other
requirements of this district’s electronic filing procedures.
Provenance
- Source
- www.scd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
31dffa23f0211be6bc2e416e395ae7229624266f2d0349d7deab4d301812abad
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.