US · rules
D.S.C. Local Civ. Rule 26.01
Interrogatories to Be Answered by Each Party
Answers to the interrogatories set
out below are used for purposes of assigning cases and shall be filed with the court and served on
all parties at the time a party first appears. In removed cases, the removing defendant shall file
these responses with the removal papers. All other parties shall file responses no later than
fourteen (14) days after service of the notice of removal. If a party fails to file the required
responses on time, the clerk of court shall draw the requirement to the attention of the party (or
counsel) and allow fourteen (14) days to file responses. The clerk of court shall have the
authority to extend the time for responding. Absent order to the contrary, categories of actions
listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B) are exempt from the requirements of this rule. Compliance
with this rule satisfies the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1. The following information is
required:
(A) State the full name, address, and telephone number of all persons or legal
entities who may have a subrogation interest in each claim and state the
basis and extent of that interest.
(B) As to each claim, state whether it should be tried jury or nonjury and why.
(C) State whether the party submitting these responses is a publicly owned
company and separately identify (1) any parent corporation and any publicly
held corporation owning ten percent (10%) or more of the party’s stock; (2)
each publicly owned company of which it is a parent; and (3) each publicly
owned company in which the party owns ten percent (10%) or more of the
outstanding shares.
(D) State the basis for asserting the claim in the division in which it was filed (or
the basis of any challenge to the appropriateness of the division). See Local
Civ. Rule 3.01 (D.S.C.).
(E) Is this action related in whole or in part to any other matter filed in this
district, whether civil or criminal? If so, provide (1) a short caption and the
full case number of the related action; (2) an explanation of how the matters
are related; and (3) a statement of the status of the related action. Counsel
should disclose any cases that may be related regardless of whether they are
still pending. Whether cases are related such that they should be assigned
to a single judge will be determined by the clerk of court based on a
determination of whether the cases arise from the same or identical
transactions, happenings, or events; involve the identical parties or property;
or for any other reason would entail substantial duplication of labor if heard
by different judges.14
(F) [Defendants only.] If the defendant is improperly identified, give the proper
identification and state whether counsel will accept service of an amended
summons and pleading reflecting the correct identification.
(G) [Defendants only.] If you contend that some other person or legal entity is,
in whole or in part, liable to you or the party asserting a claim against you in
this matter, identify such person or entity and describe the basis of their
liability.
(H) Parties or Intervenors in a Diversity Case. In an action in which
jurisdiction is based on diversity under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), a party or
intervenor must, unless the court orders otherwise, name – and identify the
citizenship of – every individual or entity whose citizenship is attributed to
that party or intervenor. This response must be supplemented when any
later event occurs that could affect the court’s jurisdiction under § 1332(a).
Provenance
- Source
- www.scd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
f3c99b6fa54052a2d9708ed80833af3979279fbbe08af27d050601c3601a6909
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.