Bindinglaw

US · rules

D.S.C. Local Civ. Rule 16.00

Exemptions and Stay of Deadlines

activein force · 2023-02-22 – presentact-effective-date

(A) Exempt Actions. Scheduling orders generally will not be entered in any

action listed in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B) (categories of actions exempted

from the federal rule initial disclosure and conference requirements). To the

extent discovery is appropriate in any action covered by Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(a)(1)(B), it shall be governed by Local Civ. Rule 26.04 (D.S.C.) absent

entry of a specific scheduling order.

(B) Non Exempt Pro Se Actions. In any action not covered by Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(a)(1)(B)(iii) and in which a party is proceeding without counsel (“pro

se”), the court’s initial order shall address whether the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)

conference or any other federal or local rule requirements addressed in

Local Civ. Rules 16.01-16.02 (D.S.C.) are waived.8 Except to the extent the

requirements are waived, orders in pro se actions shall address all deadlines

listed in Local Civ. Rules 16.01-16.02 (D.S.C.).

(C) Stay of Deadlines and Entry of Scheduling Orders. The court may stay

entry of the scheduling order(s) and all federal and local civil rule disclosure

and conference requirements pending resolution of a motion to remand or to

dismiss or other dispositive motion. Any party desiring a stay on this basis

shall file a separate motion to stay. No consultation or separate

memorandum is required.

8 Due to the special concerns raised by oral communications between counsel and unrepresented

litigants, it is the general practice in this district to waive the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)

conference requirement when any party is proceeding pro se. See also Local Civ. Rule

7.02 (D.S.C.) (no consultation requirement in pro se actions). Because these concerns are

not present as to written communications or submissions, it is the general practice in this

district not to waive the disclosure requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)-(3), the report

requirement of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and the various requirements of Local Civ. Rule 26

(D.S.C.) in a pro se action to which they otherwise apply. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)(B)

(exempting prisoner pro se actions from the 26(a)(1) requirements absent order to the

contrary); Local Civ. Rule 26.03(D) (D.S.C.) (addressing submission of Fed. R. Civ. P.

26(f) report when the conference requirement is waived).

Provenance

Source
www.scd.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
08fdddd158529d09a1c099b967011f585af4aa5e98b39f10802f3ce46784752b
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.