US · rules
D.R.I. LR Gen 210(d)
(d) Hearing
(1) Forum. In the Court’s discretion, any hearing conducted pursuant to LR Gen 210
may be conducted before a magistrate judge or bankruptcy judge designated by
the Court, a single district judge or all of the active judges of the Court who are
eligible and able to participate. However, if the disciplinary proceeding was
initiated by a complaint by a district judge, magistrate judge, or bankruptcy judge;
or, if a magistrate judge or bankruptcy judge made any recommendation to the
Court pursuant to LR Gen 210(b)(2), any such hearing shall not be conducted by
that judge, nor shall that judge participate in any decision or other action taken by
the Court with respect to the matter.
(A) If the hearing is conducted by a district judge, the Court may authorize
that district judge to order whatever disciplinary action is appropriate
under these Local Rules without further action by the Court.
(B) If the hearing is conducted by a magistrate judge or bankruptcy judge, the
magistrate judge or bankruptcy judge shall submit findings of fact and
recommendations for disposition to the Court and the Clerk shall serve a
copy of the findings and recommendations upon the attorney and any
special prosecutor appointed by the Court.
(C) Within 14 days from the date of the order, the attorney and/or any special
prosecutor appointed by the Court may serve and file written objections to
the report. Failure to file an objection within the 14-day period shall be
deemed a waiver of any objection. Those portions of the magistrate judge
or bankruptcy judge’s findings and recommendations to which objection is
made shall be reviewed by the Court de novo based on the record
compiled before the magistrate judge or bankruptcy judge. The Court may
accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
recommendations made by the magistrate judge or bankruptcy judge or it
may receive further evidence or recommit the matter to the magistrate
judge or bankruptcy judge with instructions.
(2) Conduct of Hearing. The Court may elect to appoint a special prosecutor to
present evidence at any disciplinary hearing and to cross-examine any witnesses.
The respondent attorney shall have a similar right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses and to be represented by counsel.
Effective 12/1/18: §§(a)-(d) amended. Effective 12/1/15: §§(d)(1)(A)-(C) amended. Effective 12/1/11: §§(c)(3)
and (d)(1)(C) amended. The numerical references in this rule were altered as part of the restyling of numerical
references throughout the Local Rules. Effective 12/1/09: §§(c)(3) and (d)(1)(C) amended.
History
CROSS-REFERENCES See LR Gen 101(f) (defining “Court” generally); LR Gen 209 (Basis for Disciplinary Action) and LR Gen 211 (Disciplinary Action by Court). See also LR Cv 72 (authority of magistrate judges). ____________________
Provenance
- Source
- www.rid.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
d8996786aa75c9020bd3850801cd010aecb8a424f28794e53900cb334a675b70
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.