Bindinglaw

US · rules

D.R.I. LR Gen 108

Interpreters

activein force · 2024-04-01 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Use of Interpreter. Whether a language or sign language interpreter is required in any

proceeding shall be determined by the Court. No interpreter shall participate in any

proceeding unless first approved by the Court.

(b) Requests for Interpreters.

(1) Cases Brought by the United States. In all criminal cases and in civil cases

initiated by the United States, requests for interpreters shall be made to this

Court’s staff interpreter. The Federal Defender and counsel appointed by the

Court representing an indigent client shall use the Court’s staff interpreter,

whenever possible, for all in-court proceedings.

Unless otherwise authorized by the Court, counsel for a party who intends to seek

reimbursement for interpreter services provided outside of Court proceedings

shall first request such services from the Court’s staff interpreter. If the Court’s

staff interpreter is unavailable to provide such services, counsel may utilize a

suitable replacement in accordance with the procedures outlined in the District of

Rhode Island’s Criminal Justice Act Plan.

(2) Other Cases. In all other cases, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, a party

seeking to utilize an interpreter shall be responsible for obtaining and

compensating the interpreter; provided, however, any such interpreter who

participates in a proceeding before the Court must first be approved in accordance

with subsection (a) of this Rule.

(c) Number of Interpreters. Unless the Court otherwise orders for good cause shown, no

more than one interpreter shall be provided, at Court expense, to any party.

(d) Auxiliary Aides for the Hearing Impaired. Interpreter services, including services

rendered by a properly qualified sign language interpreter, for a person who is hearing-impaired or who otherwise has a communication disability shall be obtained in the same

manner as language interpreter services. When a party or witness in a proceeding is

hearing-impaired, the Court, where and to the extent appropriate, may provide auxiliary

aids, such as real time transcription in lieu of a sign language interpreter.

Effective 12/2/13: §(b)(1) amended.

History

CROSS-REFERENCES See generally 28 U.S.C §§ 1827-1828 (provision of interpreter services in federal district courts); 28 U.S.C. §1920(6) (taxation of interpreter costs) and § 1918 (taxation of costs of prosecution). See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 43(f) (appointment and cost of interpreters in civil proceedings), Fed. R. Crim. P. 28 (interpreters in criminal proceedings), LR Cv 54 (taxation of costs in civil cases), and Criminal Justice Act Plan for the District of Rhode Island.

Provenance

Source
www.rid.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
cf9c15ee13dc40a634aa9e309701de390c92fe18d46df3c07b070eb897594ba4
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
D.R.I. LR Gen 108 — Interpreters · binding.law