Bindinglaw

US · rules

E.D. Pa. L. Civ. R. 42.1

Consolidation of Cases

activein force · 2023-05-08 – presentact-effective-date

If a party seeks consolidation of cases that do not otherwise qualify as “related” under these

Local Rules, the following procedure applies:

1) A letter shall be sent to the Chief judge and docketed in every case that would be

affected by the proposed consolidation. The letter must:

a. attach a comprehensive list of cases proposed for consolidation.

b. state whether all parties support consolidation.

c. concisely set forth the basis on which consolidation is warranted.

d. describe the scope of the proposed consolidation, e.g. for discovery

purposes only, for pretrial purposes only, etc.

The Chief Judge, following consultation with all judges whose dockets would be affected by

consolidation, shall determine whether consolidation is warranted, and the scope of the

consolidation.

Provenance

Source
www.paed.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-18
Content hash
48dd159d03ae229ad50d91faa8c2839999365bd5ad5f15ef4947f41b46614faf
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.