Bindinglaw

US · rules

D. Or. LR 65.1-3

Examination of Sureties or Other Security Providers

activein force · 2019-01-19 – presentact-effective-date

Any party may apply for an order requiring an opposing party to show cause why it should not be required to furnish further or different security, or requiring personal sureties to justify the full amount of the security.

History

January 19, 2019: LR 65.1-3: In the title, added "or Other Security Providers" after "Sureties." In the rule text, replaced "surety" with "security."

Provenance

Source
www.ord.uscourts.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-18
Edition
fed-district-2026-09-19
Content hash
40bf45eea5c93e21d28426da208fb765fe0750acf4d78f7c74b6a8f3ff4768d6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.