US · rules
D. Or. Crim. LR 32-1
Sentencing and Judgment
(a) Time of Sentencing
(1) In General. The Court must impose sentence without unnecessary delay. However, sufficient time between adjudication and sentencing is required to enable the parties to review the completed presentence report, offer any objections, and allow the probation officer to revise the report where appropriate and attempt to resolve disputed facts. Therefore, the sentencing date shall be set at or after eighty-four (84) calendar days following entry of a guilty plea or verdict.
(2) Changing Time Limits; Waiver of Disclosure and Objection Time Requirements.
(A) With the approval of the Court, the parties may, for good cause, waive the minimum disclosure periods required by Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 and Local Rules. In such cases, the parties shall confer with the probation office and the Court, and the Court will approve the timeline for disclosure of the presentence report and sentencing.
(B) With the approval of the Court, the parties may, for good cause, waive the fourteen (14)-day period, set forth under Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f)(1), to review and file objections to the presentence report. In such cases, the parties shall submit any objections to the presentence report directly to the Court with their sentencing materials; unless directed by the Court, the probation officer will not be required to respond to any objections or otherwise prepare an addendum to the report.
(b) Disclosing the Report and Recommendation
(1) Pre-Plea Presentence Reports. For good cause, and with the approval or order of the Court, the probation office may prepare and disclose a presentence report to the parties and the Court prior to a guilty plea, provided that:
(A) defense counsel provides the probation office with advance consent on the defendant’s behalf for the preparation and disclosure of the pre-plea report; and
(B) the government indicates it has no objection.
If a sentencing date has not been set at the time of the commencement of the pre-plea presentence investigation, the probation office shall confer with the parties and the Court to propose an appropriate disclosure timeline based upon an anticipated sentencing date. The pre-plea presentence report shall otherwise be prepared and disclosed according to the requirements set forth in Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 and Local Rules.
(2) Minimum Required Notice. Consistent with Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(e)(2), at least thirty-five (35) calendar days prior to the sentencing date, the probation officer shall provide a copy of the presentence report to the attorney for the government and to defense counsel. Defense counsel shall be responsible for disclosing the report to the defendant.
(c) Submitting the Report. No later than ten (10) days prior to the sentencing date, the presentence report, including the addendum and any attachments, shall be filed with the Court and disclosed to the parties.
(d) Sentencing
(1) Objections that are not submitted to the probation officer within the 14-day timeline set forth in detail in Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(f) or provided to the Court prior to sentencing may be raised at the sentencing hearing only for good cause shown.
(2) The Court’s findings on disputed facts or controverted matters contained in the presentence report will be documented in the Statement of Reasons.
History
August 1, 2019: Crim. LR. 32-1: New rule promulgated to replace Standing Order 2013-2.
Provenance
- Source
- www.ord.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
6d12f9c3f90073fd821d161a6eb28aaebe24e92ae9ba9ca076d1f30dd1629a44
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.