US · rules
W.D. Okla. LCvR56.1
Summary Judgment Procedure
(a) Absent leave of court, each party may file only one motion under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 56.
(b) The brief in support of a motion for summary judgment (or partial summary
judgment) shall begin with a section stating the material facts to which the movant contends
no genuine dispute exists. The facts shall be set forth in concise, numbered paragraphs.
(c) The brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment (or partial summary
judgment) shall begin with a section responding, by correspondingly numbered paragraph, to
the facts that the movant contends are not in dispute and shall state any fact that is disputed.
Separately, the brief in opposition may, in concise, numbered paragraphs, state any additional
facts the nonmovant contends preclude judgment as a matter of law. The nonmovant shall
not present facts that are not material to an issue raised by the movant.
(d) Each individual statement by the movant or nonmovant pursuant to
subparagraph (b) or (c) of this rule shall be followed by citation, with particularity, to any
evidentiary material that the party presents in support of its position pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
56(c).
(e) All material facts set forth in the statement of material facts of the movant may be
deemed admitted for the purpose of summary judgment unless specifically controverted by
the nonmovant using the procedures set forth in this rule.
Provenance
- Source
- www.okwd.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
8c90a97dbd187a9f0e41bcda9d14c49091e4d4b9449a62d16e2821c17bae61c7
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.