US · rules
E.D. Okla. LCvR 56.1
Summary Judgment Procedure
(a) Absent leave of Court, each party may file only one motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56.
(b) The brief in support of a motion for summary judgment (or partial summary judgment)
shall begin with a section stating the material facts to which the movant contends no
genuine dispute exists. The facts shall be set forth in concise, numbered paragraphs.
(c) The response brief in opposition to a motion for summary judgment (or partial
summary judgment) shall begin with a section responding, by correspondingly
numbered paragraph, to the facts that the movant contends are not in dispute and shall
state any fact that is disputed. Separately, the brief in opposition may, in concise,
numbered paragraphs, state any additional facts the nonmovant contends preclude
judgment as a matter of law. The nonmovant shall not present facts that are not material
to an issue raised by the movant.
(d) Each individual statement by the movant or nonmovant pursuant to subparagraph (b) or
(c) of this rule shall be followed by citation, with particularity, to any evidentiary material
that the party presents in support of its position pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c).
(e) All material facts set forth in the statement of material facts of the movant may be
deemed admitted for the purpose of summary judgment unless specifically controverted
by the nonmovant using the procedures set forth in this rule.
Provenance
- Source
- www.oked.uscourts.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-18
- Edition
- fed-district-2026-09-19
- Content hash
766f76c97b86fe735e970e80e3922cd3fc4723b433baa975519729dcfaef322c
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.